|
joyo
9:47 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
If ChillTheKunt ever got in the public eye l would imagine his domestic violence would need to be cancelled asap
|
ChillTheKeel
9:46 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
Hermit Road 9:31
Tory Boy resorts to laughable lies yet again. It can only be pure projection. Fancy being ashamed of who you are.
I know Tory voters who might say 'I vote Tory but they fuck me off with........ this WOKE bollocks" for example. But you don't get any of that on here from Hermit. Instead it's unquestioning, slavish, cultish devotion. And it's fucking weird.
|
twoleftfeet
9:37 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
Douglas Murray described the left wing wokists as chihuahua dogs.
He said they yap and bark and are generally annoying and big dogs ignore them for a bit but eventually the big dogs say enough and attack them and off they run.
I consider myself a Labrador š
|
stewie griffin
9:34 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
i'm convinced that the only people who actually think politics is important anymore all post on this one website.
How many of the sorts of fucktards that are into this sort of thing could identify Grant SHAPPS in a picture? Emily THORNBERRY? No one fucking cares. Least of all these fucking arseholes who have appointed themselves of the arbiters of all that is right and wrong.
|
Hermit Road
9:31 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
ChillTheKeel 7:27 Wed Jun 9
I know where Iām from.
Since I found out you went to private school and are WHOs Rick from the Young Ones, an angry little, socially inept, mockney with 6th form politics, you got upset and have taken to calling me middle class. Iāve been called worse, by better.
|
Hermit Road
9:27 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
āHermit, that closing borders was in reference to us not closing borders because of Covid, not what Trump was doing down on the Mexican border which probably was racistā
Trump only closed the border to Mexico because of COVID.
He did close the border with China in response to COVID and was roundly condemned as racist for it, which is probably why other politicians were worried about the press reaction if they did it.
As for the govt legislation to change attitudes, that is not something a conservative government should ever do. You canāt legislate against wokeness, any more than you can legislate against other beliefs. What would you suggest, a bill to ban the use of pronouns, or maybe one to ban the use of peopleās historic tweets, or perhaps a Bill to stop MPs kneeling for Marxist BLM?
The left are very smart with this, this whole movement started with Marxist academics and has spread from there, then they blame conservatives for its existence because āthey didnāt do enough to stop itā, when in reality, they are the only ones trying to stop it. I also spelled conservative with a small ācā for a reason.
|
fraser
9:00 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
A Serbian volley ball player has been banned for 2 matches for pulling her eyes at the corners making them slanty in a game against Thailand, as it's insulting.
|
ChillTheKeel
7:27 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
The Tories have been in power for over a decade. They, and their supporters, need to own this shit.
_____
Hermit the fraud won't own up to anything. He was even salivating over the Tories opening the floodgates for the Chinese in HK.
No matter what those cunts do, that soppy helmet will be applauding like a proper little GOVE.
|
BRANDED
7:25 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
Hereās a good article explaining how the Tories allowed this to happen.
https://unherd.com/2021/06/the-tories-created-their-own-worst-enemy/?fbclid=IwAR23ZIPgvPWKR2i-jpPG5A2lnOwIWMpD9tUeCk-ros7rBqroSeZ8l4Ao3Qw
|
ChillTheKeel
7:23 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
Hermit Road 6:11 Wed Jun 9
Touch a nerve did I? There's only one middle class ponce on here here. A brainwashed Tory cultist who laughably pretends to speak up for the working class form the comfort of his suburban shitheap.
Stick that on your white picket fence, you laughably transparent fraud.
|
Far Cough
6:36 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
Hermit, that closing borders was in reference to us not closing borders because of Covid, not what Trump was doing down on the Mexican border which probably was racist
|
Fo the Communist
6:29 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
Lefty types can push it as much as they like but it's the lack of legislation - or indeed any kickback from elected leaders - that allows it to flourish.
The Tories have been in power for over a decade. They, and their supporters, need to own this shit.
|
BRANDED
6:21 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
Anyone know what the jokes were? Iād love a good laugh.
|
Hermit Road
6:11 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
"Sorry, I must be a bit thick but why is closing our borders considered racist?"
Because Trump did it and the entire media deemed it racist and borderline Hitler.
Then Biden did it and it immediately became non-racist.
And Keel, shut up you posh cunt. It's your middle class lefty mates who are pushing all this.
|
Far Cough
4:15 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
Sorry, I must be a bit thick but why is closing our borders considered racist?
|
stewie griffin
4:01 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
ChillTheKeel wrote...
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
I fully accept WOKE has engulfed the Left. But no surprises the Tory cultists on here can't say the same for their neoliberal party. But then that's why they're cultists
less than two weeks ago, the cunt cummings was announcing that we had failed to close the borders because they didn't want to be called racist.
Pause on that for a moment. That's how far this bollocks has gone now. It's bigger and more powerful than the people that supposedly run the country. Politics is irrelevant. This shit is everywhere. In everything.
|
Sven Roeder
3:51 Wed Jun 9
Re: Historic offensive tweets England cricket player
|
ECB's STATEMENT
"The ECB has been notified that John Holder and Ismail Dawood have withdrawn their employment claims against the ECB without payment of compensation or costs. The ECB is committed to a world-class diverse and inclusive officiating system, with opportunities for all. The ECB appreciates Mr Holder and Mr Dawood's engagement in addressing these matters, and will now discuss with Mr Holder his interest in contributing to its ongoing review of officiating."
THE REACTION:
Holder told ESPNcricinfo: "Our case against the ECB has been beaten on a legal technicality. I haven't withdrawn any of the claims I made.
"The tone of the ECB's statement would give the uninvolved reader the impression that we have accepted their version of events and backed down. This is not the case at all. We remain convinced that the ECB is institutionally racist.
"Having read that statement, I knew I couldn't work with these people any more. There is no trust. They aren't looking to learn from my experiences; they are looking to silence me and give the impression that things have been resolved. That is misleading and disingenuous."
Dawood was equally unimpressed. "We were offered token roles to work with Neil Snowball at the ECB which were an insult to us and the many others that have suffered at the hands of the ECB," he told ESPNcricinfo.
WHY THEY WITHDREW
Holder and Ismail Dawood had launched a legal challenge against the ECB suggesting that their careers as umpires had been adversely affected by institutional racism at the ECB.
But with the law stating that any such claim has to be brought within three months of the termination of employment, Holder and Dawood were always unlikely to prevail. Dawood was last on the ECB's reserve umpire list in 2014; Holder's last game was in 2009. They reasoned, however, that by bringing the case they could highlight the issues they had faced and hoped they may win an exemption on the basis of public interest.
At a mediation meeting a week ago, offered by the ECB at the umpires' request, it is understood the ECB offered an acknowledgement that they had fallen short of the standards they set themselves. They stopped short of an apology, however, and no compensation was offered. Both Holder and Dawood rejected the "acknowledgement" and what they described as the "token roles" they were offered and declined to sign any non-disclosure agreement.
Holder and Dawood subsequently withdrew their employment claim as pursuing it further could have exposed them to a claim for costs from the ECB.
|
ChillTheKeel
3:39 Wed Jun 9
Re: If you're on social media, what would you get "cancelled" for if you were in the public eye?
|
I fully accept WOKE has engulfed the Left. But no surprises the Tory cultists on here can't say the same for their neoliberal party. But then that's why they're cultists
|
riosleftsock
3:27 Wed Jun 9
Re: Historic offensive tweets England cricket player
|
bruuno
I would write to the headteacher and board of governors about that, its a clear case of breach of power.
I would quote section 406 of the 1996 Education Act with regard to the introduction of partisan politics in school, its expressly forbidden and the responsibility of the headteacher and governers.
|
bruuuno
3:11 Wed Jun 9
Re: Historic offensive tweets England cricket player
|
My friends 8 year old came home crying the other night as all the white kids abs black kids all had to go into separate groups before the white kids where basically told how bad they were. The thing is teachers are absolutely the worst of the lot, theyāre all fucking mental and most of them are militant left wingers. Donāt bode well does it
|
Hermit Road
3:09 Wed Jun 9
Re: Historic offensive tweets England cricket player
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero 10:24 Wed Jun 9
I read that yesterday with quotes from Holder saying the ECB statement was misleading. Then I read the ECB statement and thought it was totally accurate.
I think if things are totally accurate then it is fair enough.
If Holder thought he had a case, he should have brought it within the time allowed. He had no legal case, but saw the mood was right to shout racism and did so probably hoping they would pay him off to shut him up.
|
|
|
|
